Demographics details for Washburn, WI vs Hickman, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washburn, WI vs Hickman, TN.
Data | Washburn | Hickman |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,911 | 25,455 |
Median Age | 52.2 years | 41.8 years |
Median Income | $58,504 | $54,669 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Washburn vs Hickman
- The population in Hickman is higher at 25,455, compared to 16,911 in Washburn.
- Residents in Washburn have a higher median age of 52.2 years compared to 41.8 years in Hickman.
- Washburn has a higher median income of $58,504 compared to $54,669 in Hickman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Washburn at 48.0% compared to 40.0% in Hickman.
- The poverty level is higher in Hickman at 12%, compared to 8% in Washburn.
- The unemployment rate in Washburn is higher at 3.3%, compared to 3.1% in Hickman.
Demographics
Demographics Washburn vs Hickman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Washburn | Hickman |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 3 |
White | 92 | 89 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washburn vs Hickman
- In Hickman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Washburn.
- Washburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 89% in Hickman.
- Both Washburn and Hickman have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Hickman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Washburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hickman at 4%, compared to 3% in Washburn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Washburn at 1% compared to 0% in Hickman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Washburn | Hickman |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 13.9% |
Depression | 24.3% | 28.4% |
Smoking | 17.4% | 24.6% |
Binge Drinking | 23.4% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 34.0% | 37.0% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washburn vs Hickman
- In Hickman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.7% in Washburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hickman at 28.4% versus 24.3% in Washburn.
- Hickman has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 17.4% in Washburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washburn at 23.4% compared to 16.2% in Hickman.
- Hickman has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Washburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hickman at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Washburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Washburn | Hickman |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (115) | 0.7% (185) |
High School Diploma | 22.9% (3,881) | 22.0% (5,594) |
Less than High School | 9.6% (1,628) | 23.4% (5,965) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (2,913) | 8.7% (2,226) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washburn vs Hickman
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Washburn and Hickman at 0.7%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washburn hold a high school diploma at 22.9% compared to 22.0% in Hickman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hickman at 23.4%, compared to 9.6% in Washburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 8.7% in Hickman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.