Demographics details for Washburn, WI vs Cedar park, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washburn, WI vs Cedar park, TX.
| Data | Washburn | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,911 | 77,642 |
| Median Age | 52.2 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $58,504 | $118,903 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Washburn vs Cedar park
- The population in Cedar park is higher at 77,642, compared to 16,911 in Washburn.
- Residents in Washburn have a higher median age of 52.2 years compared to 37.6 years in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903, compared to $58,504 in Washburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Washburn at 48.0% compared to 45.0% in Cedar park.
- Washburn has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.3% in Washburn.
Demographics
Demographics Washburn vs Cedar park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washburn | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 92 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washburn vs Cedar park
- In Cedar park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Washburn.
- Washburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in Washburn.
- Cedar park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 2% in Washburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar park at 10%, compared to 3% in Washburn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Washburn at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washburn | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.4% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 34.0% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washburn vs Cedar park
- More residents in Washburn report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washburn at 24.3% compared to 24.1% in Cedar park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washburn at 17.4% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washburn at 23.4% compared to 17.9% in Cedar park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Washburn at 34.0% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washburn at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washburn | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (115) | 0.4% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 22.9% (3,881) | 8.9% (6,896) |
| Less than High School | 9.6% (1,628) | 4.1% (3,156) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (2,913) | 35.8% (27,785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washburn vs Cedar park
- A higher percentage of residents in Washburn have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washburn hold a high school diploma at 22.9% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- More residents in Washburn have less than a high school education at 9.6% compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 17.2% in Washburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.