Demographics details for Warwick, RI vs Taylorsville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warwick, RI vs Taylorsville, GA.
Data | Warwick | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Population | 83,016 | 258 |
Median Age | 44.5 years | 56.7 years |
Median Income | $81,009 | $41,250 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 62.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Warwick vs Taylorsville
- In Warwick, the population is higher at 83,016, compared to 258 in Taylorsville.
- The median age in Taylorsville is higher at 56.7 years, compared to 44.5 years in Warwick.
- Warwick has a higher median income of $81,009 compared to $41,250 in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 40.0% in Warwick.
- The poverty level is higher in Taylorsville at 10%, compared to 7% in Warwick.
- Taylorsville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.8% in Warwick.
Demographics
Demographics Warwick vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Warwick | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 83 | 82 |
Asian | 3 | 3 |
Hispanic | 6 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warwick vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warwick at 3% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- Warwick has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 82% in Taylorsville.
- Both Warwick and Taylorsville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Warwick.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Taylorsville at 7%, compared to 5% in Warwick.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Warwick and Taylorsville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Warwick | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 17.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 12.0% |
Depression | 27.5% | 24.1% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 17.8% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 29.3% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 40.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warwick vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.2% in Warwick.
- Depression is more prevalent in Warwick at 27.5% compared to 24.1% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher smoking rate at 17.8% compared to 14.9% in Warwick.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warwick at 19.2% compared to 17.0% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has higher obesity rates at 32.5% compared to 29.3% in Warwick.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 15.0% in Warwick.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Warwick | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (374) | 0.8% (2) |
High School Diploma | 17.1% (14,174) | 24.8% (64) |
Less than High School | 10.4% (8,656) | 51.2% (132) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (20,074) | 22.5% (58) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warwick vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Warwick.
- In Taylorsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 17.1% in Warwick.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 51.2%, compared to 10.4% in Warwick.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warwick hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 22.5% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.