Demographics details for Warwick, RI vs Shasta lake, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Warwick, RI vs Shasta lake, CA.

Data Warwick Shasta lake
Population 83,016 10,335
Median Age 44.5 years 38.8 years
Median Income $81,009 $54,490
Married Families 40.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 7% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 5.1

Population Comparison: Warwick vs Shasta lake

  • In Warwick, the population is higher at 83,016, compared to 10,335 in Shasta lake.
  • Residents in Warwick have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 38.8 years in Shasta lake.
  • Warwick has a higher median income of $81,009 compared to $54,490 in Shasta lake.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Warwick at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in Shasta lake.
  • The poverty level is higher in Shasta lake at 12%, compared to 7% in Warwick.
  • Shasta lake has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.8% in Warwick.

Demographics

Demographics Warwick vs Shasta lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Warwick Shasta lake
Black 3 Data is updating
White 83 74
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 6 12
Two or More Races 5 11
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Warwick vs Shasta lake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warwick at 3% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
  • Warwick has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 74% in Shasta lake.
  • The Asian population is larger in Warwick at 3% compared to 1% in Shasta lake.
  • Shasta lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 6% in Warwick.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shasta lake at 11%, compared to 5% in Warwick.
  • In Shasta lake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Warwick.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Warwick Shasta lake
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 13.2%
Depression 27.5% 22.9%
Smoking 14.9% 17.4%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 17.5%
Obesity 29.3% 32.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Warwick vs Shasta lake

  • In Shasta lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.2% in Warwick.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Warwick at 27.5% compared to 22.9% in Shasta lake.
  • Shasta lake has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 14.9% in Warwick.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Warwick at 19.2% compared to 17.5% in Shasta lake.
  • Shasta lake has higher obesity rates at 32.5% compared to 29.3% in Warwick.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 15.0% in Warwick.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Warwick Shasta lake
No Schooling 0.5% (374) 0.6% (67)
High School Diploma 17.1% (14,174) 17.0% (1,759)
Less than High School 10.4% (8,656) 11.4% (1,176)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.2% (20,074) 9.2% (946)

Education Levels Comparison: Warwick vs Shasta lake

  • In Shasta lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Warwick.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Warwick hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 17.0% in Shasta lake.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shasta lake at 11.4%, compared to 10.4% in Warwick.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Warwick hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.