Demographics details for Warwick, RI vs Severna park, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warwick, RI vs Severna park, MD.
Data | Warwick | Severna park |
---|---|---|
Population | 83,016 | 40,452 |
Median Age | 44.5 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $81,009 | $164,288 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 3% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Warwick vs Severna park
- In Warwick, the population is higher at 83,016, compared to 40,452 in Severna park.
- Residents in Warwick have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 41.5 years in Severna park.
- Severna park has a higher median income of $164,288, compared to $81,009 in Warwick.
- In Severna park, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 40.0% in Warwick.
- Warwick has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 3% in Severna park.
- The unemployment rate in Warwick is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.2% in Severna park.
Demographics
Demographics Warwick vs Severna park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Warwick | Severna park |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 3 |
White | 83 | 86 |
Asian | 3 | 3 |
Hispanic | 6 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warwick vs Severna park
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Warwick and Severna park at 3%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Severna park at 86% compared to 83% in Warwick.
- Both Warwick and Severna park have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Warwick at 6% compared to 3% in Severna park.
- Both Warwick and Severna park have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Warwick and Severna park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Warwick | Severna park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 13.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 7.3% |
Depression | 27.5% | 19.9% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 9.0% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 29.3% | 31.9% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warwick vs Severna park
- More residents in Warwick report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 13.1% in Severna park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Warwick at 27.5% compared to 19.9% in Severna park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Warwick at 14.9% compared to 9.0% in Severna park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warwick at 19.2% compared to 18.4% in Severna park.
- Severna park has higher obesity rates at 31.9% compared to 29.3% in Warwick.
- Disability percentages are higher in Warwick at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Severna park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Warwick | Severna park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (374) | 0.4% (145) |
High School Diploma | 17.1% (14,174) | 10.9% (4,392) |
Less than High School | 10.4% (8,656) | 4.3% (1,731) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (20,074) | 38.1% (15,411) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warwick vs Severna park
- A higher percentage of residents in Warwick have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Severna park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warwick hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 10.9% in Severna park.
- More residents in Warwick have less than a high school education at 10.4% compared to 4.3% in Severna park.
- In Severna park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 24.2% in Warwick.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.