Demographics details for Warwick, RI vs Schenectady, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warwick, RI vs Schenectady, NY.
| Data | Warwick | Schenectady |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,016 | 68,809 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 36.0 years |
| Median Income | $81,009 | $54,650 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Warwick vs Schenectady
- In Warwick, the population is higher at 83,016, compared to 68,809 in Schenectady.
- Residents in Warwick have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 36.0 years in Schenectady.
- Warwick has a higher median income of $81,009 compared to $54,650 in Schenectady.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Warwick at 40.0% compared to 28.0% in Schenectady.
- The poverty level is higher in Schenectady at 13%, compared to 7% in Warwick.
- Schenectady has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.8% in Warwick.
Demographics
Demographics Warwick vs Schenectady provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Warwick | Schenectady |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 20 |
| White | 83 | 47 |
| Asian | 3 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Warwick vs Schenectady
- In Schenectady, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 3% in Warwick.
- Warwick has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 47% in Schenectady.
- In Schenectady, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Warwick.
- Schenectady has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 6% in Warwick.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Schenectady at 13%, compared to 5% in Warwick.
- In Schenectady, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Warwick.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Warwick | Schenectady |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 29.3% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warwick vs Schenectady
- In Schenectady, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.2% in Warwick.
- Depression is more prevalent in Warwick at 27.5% compared to 24.0% in Schenectady.
- Schenectady has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 14.9% in Warwick.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warwick at 19.2% compared to 16.2% in Schenectady.
- Schenectady has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 29.3% in Warwick.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Warwick and Schenectady at 15.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Warwick | Schenectady |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (374) | 1.7% (1,194) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (14,174) | 15.3% (10,540) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (8,656) | 14.7% (10,146) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (20,074) | 15.0% (10,303) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warwick vs Schenectady
- In Schenectady, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Warwick.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warwick hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 15.3% in Schenectady.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Schenectady at 14.7%, compared to 10.4% in Warwick.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warwick hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 15.0% in Schenectady.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.