Demographics details for Warwick, RI vs Rutherford, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warwick, RI vs Rutherford, NJ.
| Data | Warwick | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,016 | 18,662 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $81,009 | $128,576 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Warwick vs Rutherford
- In Warwick, the population is higher at 83,016, compared to 18,662 in Rutherford.
- Residents in Warwick have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 40.5 years in Rutherford.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576, compared to $81,009 in Warwick.
- In Rutherford, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 40.0% in Warwick.
- The poverty level is higher in Rutherford at 9%, compared to 7% in Warwick.
- The unemployment rate in Warwick is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Warwick vs Rutherford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Warwick | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 3 |
| White | 83 | 49 |
| Asian | 3 | 16 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warwick vs Rutherford
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Warwick and Rutherford at 3%.
- Warwick has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- In Rutherford, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 3% in Warwick.
- Rutherford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 6% in Warwick.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rutherford at 11%, compared to 5% in Warwick.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Warwick and Rutherford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Warwick | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 7.8% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 10.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 29.3% | 24.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warwick vs Rutherford
- More residents in Warwick report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Warwick at 27.5% compared to 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Warwick at 14.9% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warwick at 19.2% compared to 17.6% in Rutherford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Warwick at 29.3% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Warwick at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Warwick | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (374) | 0.9% (161) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (14,174) | 12.4% (2,318) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (8,656) | 6.3% (1,175) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (20,074) | 38.9% (7,259) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warwick vs Rutherford
- In Rutherford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Warwick.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warwick hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- More residents in Warwick have less than a high school education at 10.4% compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- In Rutherford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 24.2% in Warwick.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.