Demographics details for Warwick, RI vs New milford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warwick, RI vs New milford, CT.
| Data | Warwick | New milford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,016 | 7,095 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 41.0 years |
| Median Income | $81,009 | $70,625 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Warwick vs New milford
- In Warwick, the population is higher at 83,016, compared to 7,095 in New milford.
- Residents in Warwick have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 41.0 years in New milford.
- Warwick has a higher median income of $81,009 compared to $70,625 in New milford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Warwick at 40.0% compared to 38.0% in New milford.
- The poverty level is identical in both Warwick and New milford at 7%.
- The unemployment rate in Warwick is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in New milford.
Demographics
Demographics Warwick vs New milford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Warwick | New milford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 83 | 76 |
| Asian | 3 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warwick vs New milford
- In New milford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Warwick.
- Warwick has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 76% in New milford.
- In New milford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Warwick.
- New milford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 6% in Warwick.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New milford at 6%, compared to 5% in Warwick.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Warwick and New milford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Warwick | New milford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 13.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 29.3% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warwick vs New milford
- More residents in Warwick report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 14.8% in New milford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Warwick at 27.5% compared to 22.1% in New milford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Warwick at 14.9% compared to 13.2% in New milford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warwick at 19.2% compared to 17.1% in New milford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Warwick at 29.3% compared to 27.2% in New milford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Warwick at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in New milford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Warwick | New milford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (374) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (14,174) | 21.6% (1,531) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (8,656) | 10.0% (710) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (20,074) | 23.4% (1,658) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warwick vs New milford
- A higher percentage of residents in Warwick have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in New milford.
- In New milford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 17.1% in Warwick.
- More residents in Warwick have less than a high school education at 10.4% compared to 10.0% in New milford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warwick hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 23.4% in New milford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.