Demographics details for Warwick, RI vs Flint, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warwick, RI vs Flint, MI.
| Data | Warwick | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,016 | 79,854 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 36.1 years |
| Median Income | $81,009 | $35,451 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 32% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 10.4 |
Population Comparison: Warwick vs Flint
- In Warwick, the population is higher at 83,016, compared to 79,854 in Flint.
- Residents in Warwick have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 36.1 years in Flint.
- Warwick has a higher median income of $81,009 compared to $35,451 in Flint.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Warwick at 40.0% compared to 20.0% in Flint.
- The poverty level is higher in Flint at 32%, compared to 7% in Warwick.
- Flint has a higher unemployment rate at 10.4% compared to 3.8% in Warwick.
Demographics
Demographics Warwick vs Flint provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Warwick | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 58 |
| White | 83 | 30 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warwick vs Flint
- In Flint, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 3% in Warwick.
- Warwick has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 30% in Flint.
- The Asian population is larger in Warwick at 3% compared to 1% in Flint.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Warwick at 6% compared to 4% in Flint.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Flint at 7%, compared to 5% in Warwick.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Warwick and Flint at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Warwick | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 17.3% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 29.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 29.3% | 51.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warwick vs Flint
- In Flint, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 16.2% in Warwick.
- Depression is more prevalent in Warwick at 27.5% compared to 25.6% in Flint.
- Flint has a higher smoking rate at 29.5% compared to 14.9% in Warwick.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warwick at 19.2% compared to 14.0% in Flint.
- Flint has higher obesity rates at 51.7% compared to 29.3% in Warwick.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flint at 25.0% compared to 15.0% in Warwick.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Warwick | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (374) | 0.8% (629) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (14,174) | 20.2% (16,121) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (8,656) | 15.3% (12,181) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (20,074) | 8.3% (6,616) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warwick vs Flint
- In Flint, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Warwick.
- In Flint, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 17.1% in Warwick.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flint at 15.3%, compared to 10.4% in Warwick.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warwick hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 8.3% in Flint.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.