Demographics details for Warwick, RI vs Chula vista, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warwick, RI vs Chula vista, CA.
Data | Warwick | Chula vista |
---|---|---|
Population | 83,016 | 279,170 |
Median Age | 44.5 years | 36.1 years |
Median Income | $81,009 | $101,984 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Warwick vs Chula vista
- The population in Chula vista is higher at 279,170, compared to 83,016 in Warwick.
- Residents in Warwick have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 36.1 years in Chula vista.
- Chula vista has a higher median income of $101,984, compared to $81,009 in Warwick.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Warwick at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in Chula vista.
- The poverty level is higher in Chula vista at 12%, compared to 7% in Warwick.
- Chula vista has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.8% in Warwick.
Demographics
Demographics Warwick vs Chula vista provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Warwick | Chula vista |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 5 |
White | 83 | -4 |
Asian | 3 | 15 |
Hispanic | 6 | 60 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 23 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Warwick vs Chula vista
- In Chula vista, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Warwick.
- Warwick has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to -4% in Chula vista.
- In Chula vista, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 3% in Warwick.
- Chula vista has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 60%, compared to 6% in Warwick.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chula vista at 23%, compared to 5% in Warwick.
- In Chula vista, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Warwick.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Warwick | Chula vista |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 11.1% |
Depression | 27.5% | 15.8% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 10.5% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 29.3% | 24.9% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warwick vs Chula vista
- More residents in Warwick report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.1% in Chula vista.
- Depression is more prevalent in Warwick at 27.5% compared to 15.8% in Chula vista.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Warwick at 14.9% compared to 10.5% in Chula vista.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warwick at 19.2% compared to 17.4% in Chula vista.
- Obesity rates are higher in Warwick at 29.3% compared to 24.9% in Chula vista.
- Disability percentages are higher in Warwick at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Chula vista.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Warwick | Chula vista |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (374) | 1.7% (4,667) |
High School Diploma | 17.1% (14,174) | 11.7% (32,545) |
Less than High School | 10.4% (8,656) | 18.1% (50,584) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (20,074) | 20.4% (56,958) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warwick vs Chula vista
- In Chula vista, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Warwick.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warwick hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 11.7% in Chula vista.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chula vista at 18.1%, compared to 10.4% in Warwick.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warwick hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 20.4% in Chula vista.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.