Demographics details for Warwick, RI vs Castle rock, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warwick, RI vs Castle rock, CO.
| Data | Warwick | Castle rock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,016 | 80,191 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $81,009 | $135,985 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Warwick vs Castle rock
- In Warwick, the population is higher at 83,016, compared to 80,191 in Castle rock.
- Residents in Warwick have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 35.8 years in Castle rock.
- Castle rock has a higher median income of $135,985, compared to $81,009 in Warwick.
- In Castle rock, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Warwick.
- Warwick has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 2% in Castle rock.
- Castle rock has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.8% in Warwick.
Demographics
Demographics Warwick vs Castle rock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Warwick | Castle rock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 83 | 81 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warwick vs Castle rock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warwick at 3% compared to 1% in Castle rock.
- Warwick has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 81% in Castle rock.
- The Asian population is larger in Warwick at 3% compared to 2% in Castle rock.
- Castle rock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 6% in Warwick.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Castle rock at 6%, compared to 5% in Warwick.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Warwick and Castle rock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Warwick | Castle rock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 13.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 10.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 29.3% | 24.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warwick vs Castle rock
- More residents in Warwick report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 13.3% in Castle rock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Warwick at 27.5% compared to 19.6% in Castle rock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Warwick at 14.9% compared to 10.4% in Castle rock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warwick at 19.2% compared to 18.9% in Castle rock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Warwick at 29.3% compared to 24.3% in Castle rock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Warwick at 15.0% compared to 6.0% in Castle rock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Warwick | Castle rock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (374) | 0.2% (142) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (14,174) | 6.7% (5,389) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (8,656) | 2.8% (2,284) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (20,074) | 31.8% (25,532) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warwick vs Castle rock
- A higher percentage of residents in Warwick have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Castle rock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warwick hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 6.7% in Castle rock.
- More residents in Warwick have less than a high school education at 10.4% compared to 2.8% in Castle rock.
- In Castle rock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 24.2% in Warwick.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.