Demographics details for Warrenton, VA vs Sugar grove, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Warrenton, VA vs Sugar grove, NC.

Data Warrenton Sugar grove
Population 10,197 100
Median Age 38.2 years 38.0 years
Median Income $83,737 $50,000
Married Families 32.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 6% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.5

Population Comparison: Warrenton vs Sugar grove

  • In Warrenton, the population is higher at 10,197, compared to 100 in Sugar grove.
  • Residents in Warrenton have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 38.0 years in Sugar grove.
  • Warrenton has a higher median income of $83,737 compared to $50,000 in Sugar grove.
  • In Sugar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 32.0% in Warrenton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sugar grove at 10%, compared to 6% in Warrenton.
  • Sugar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.4% in Warrenton.

Demographics

Demographics Warrenton vs Sugar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Warrenton Sugar grove
Black 8 Data is updating
White 71 100
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 Data is updating
Two or More Races 11 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Warrenton vs Sugar grove

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warrenton at 8% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sugar grove at 100% compared to 71% in Warrenton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Warrenton at 2% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Warrenton at 7% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Warrenton at 11% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Warrenton at 1% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Warrenton Sugar grove
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 9.2% Data is updating%
Depression 21.2% Data is updating%
Smoking 13.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 17.7% Data is updating%
Obesity 34.2% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 12.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Warrenton vs Sugar grove

  • More residents in Warrenton report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Warrenton at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Warrenton at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Warrenton at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Warrenton at 34.2% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Warrenton at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Warrenton Sugar grove
No Schooling 0.2% (22) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 10.6% (1,078) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 7.7% (787) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 29.2% (2,979) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Warrenton vs Sugar grove

  • A higher percentage of residents in Warrenton have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Warrenton hold a high school diploma at 10.6% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • More residents in Warrenton have less than a high school education at 7.7% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Warrenton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.2% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.