Demographics details for Warrenton, VA vs Bellingham, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warrenton, VA vs Bellingham, WA.
| Data | Warrenton | Bellingham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,197 | 93,896 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $83,737 | $64,026 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Warrenton vs Bellingham
- The population in Bellingham is higher at 93,896, compared to 10,197 in Warrenton.
- Residents in Warrenton have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 33.7 years in Bellingham.
- Warrenton has a higher median income of $83,737 compared to $64,026 in Bellingham.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Warrenton and Bellingham at 32.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Bellingham at 11%, compared to 6% in Warrenton.
- Bellingham has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.4% in Warrenton.
Demographics
Demographics Warrenton vs Bellingham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Warrenton | Bellingham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 1 |
| White | 71 | 74 |
| Asian | 2 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Warrenton vs Bellingham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warrenton at 8% compared to 1% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bellingham at 74% compared to 71% in Warrenton.
- In Bellingham, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Warrenton.
- Bellingham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 7% in Warrenton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Warrenton at 11% compared to 8% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Warrenton and Bellingham at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Warrenton | Bellingham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 30.0% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 25.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warrenton vs Bellingham
- In Bellingham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.3% in Warrenton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bellingham at 30.0% versus 21.2% in Warrenton.
- Bellingham has a higher smoking rate at 14.1% compared to 13.0% in Warrenton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warrenton at 17.7% compared to 17.3% in Bellingham.
- Obesity rates are higher in Warrenton at 34.2% compared to 25.6% in Bellingham.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Warrenton and Bellingham at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Warrenton | Bellingham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (22) | 0.5% (454) |
| High School Diploma | 10.6% (1,078) | 8.8% (8,220) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (787) | 6.2% (5,781) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.2% (2,979) | 28.9% (27,095) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warrenton vs Bellingham
- In Bellingham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Warrenton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warrenton hold a high school diploma at 10.6% compared to 8.8% in Bellingham.
- More residents in Warrenton have less than a high school education at 7.7% compared to 6.2% in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warrenton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.2% compared to 28.9% in Bellingham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.