Demographics details for Warrensburg, MO vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warrensburg, MO vs Spanish fork, UT.
Data | Warrensburg | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,458 | 44,102 |
Median Age | 24.4 years | 27.4 years |
Median Income | $54,535 | $93,989 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Warrensburg vs Spanish fork
- The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 19,458 in Warrensburg.
- The median age in Spanish fork is higher at 27.4 years, compared to 24.4 years in Warrensburg.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $54,535 in Warrensburg.
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 27.0% in Warrensburg.
- Warrensburg has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.5% in Warrensburg.
Demographics
Demographics Warrensburg vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Warrensburg | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 1 |
White | 80 | 80 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warrensburg vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warrensburg at 4% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Warrensburg and Spanish fork at 80%.
- The Asian population is larger in Warrensburg at 3% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 6% in Warrensburg.
- Both Warrensburg and Spanish fork have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Warrensburg and Spanish fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Warrensburg | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 10.8% |
Depression | 24.3% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 20.8% | 7.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 8.3% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warrensburg vs Spanish fork
- More residents in Warrensburg report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Warrensburg at 24.3% compared to 23.8% in Spanish fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Warrensburg at 20.8% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warrensburg at 16.8% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Warrensburg at 37.2% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Warrensburg at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Warrensburg | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (150) | 0.4% (175) |
High School Diploma | 9.7% (1,895) | 9.1% (4,010) |
Less than High School | 6.0% (1,174) | 5.9% (2,583) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (3,573) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warrensburg vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Warrensburg have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warrensburg hold a high school diploma at 9.7% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- More residents in Warrensburg have less than a high school education at 6.0% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 18.4% in Warrensburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.