Demographics details for Warrensburg, MO vs Darwin, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warrensburg, MO vs Darwin, MN.
| Data | Warrensburg | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,458 | 344 |
| Median Age | 24.4 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $54,535 | $62,083 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Warrensburg vs Darwin
- In Warrensburg, the population is higher at 19,458, compared to 344 in Darwin.
- The median age in Darwin is higher at 34.8 years, compared to 24.4 years in Warrensburg.
- Darwin has a higher median income of $62,083, compared to $54,535 in Warrensburg.
- In Darwin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 27.0% in Warrensburg.
- Warrensburg has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Darwin.
- The unemployment rate in Warrensburg is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Darwin.
Demographics
Demographics Warrensburg vs Darwin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Warrensburg | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 80 | 90 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warrensburg vs Darwin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warrensburg at 4% compared to 0% in Darwin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Darwin at 90% compared to 80% in Warrensburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Warrensburg at 3% compared to 0% in Darwin.
- Darwin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 6% in Warrensburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Warrensburg at 7% compared to 1% in Darwin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Warrensburg and Darwin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Warrensburg | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 22.3% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 32.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warrensburg vs Darwin
- More residents in Warrensburg report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 14.7% in Darwin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Warrensburg at 24.3% compared to 23.2% in Darwin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Warrensburg at 20.8% compared to 17.5% in Darwin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Darwin at 22.3% compared to 16.8% in Warrensburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Warrensburg at 37.2% compared to 32.7% in Darwin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Darwin at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Warrensburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Warrensburg | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (150) | 1.7% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 9.7% (1,895) | 20.9% (72) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (1,174) | 9.3% (32) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (3,573) | 11.9% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warrensburg vs Darwin
- In Darwin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.8% in Warrensburg.
- In Darwin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.9% compared to 9.7% in Warrensburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Darwin at 9.3%, compared to 6.0% in Warrensburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warrensburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 11.9% in Darwin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.