Demographics details for Warrensburg, MO vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warrensburg, MO vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Warrensburg | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,458 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 24.4 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $54,535 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Warrensburg vs Coalinga
- In Warrensburg, the population is higher at 19,458, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- The median age in Coalinga is higher at 35.0 years, compared to 24.4 years in Warrensburg.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $54,535 in Warrensburg.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 27.0% in Warrensburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 14% in Warrensburg.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.5% in Warrensburg.
Demographics
Demographics Warrensburg vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Warrensburg | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 4 |
| White | 80 | 9 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Warrensburg vs Coalinga
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Warrensburg and Coalinga at 4%.
- Warrensburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- The Asian population is larger in Warrensburg at 3% compared to 2% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 6% in Warrensburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 7% in Warrensburg.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Warrensburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Warrensburg | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warrensburg vs Coalinga
- More residents in Warrensburg report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Warrensburg at 24.3% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Warrensburg at 20.8% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warrensburg at 16.8% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 37.2% in Warrensburg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Warrensburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Warrensburg | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (150) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 9.7% (1,895) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (1,174) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (3,573) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warrensburg vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.8% in Warrensburg.
- In Coalinga, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.8% compared to 9.7% in Warrensburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 6.0% in Warrensburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warrensburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.