Demographics details for Warren, VT vs Augusta, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warren, VT vs Augusta, GA.
Data | Warren | Augusta |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,705 | 202,096 |
Median Age | 41.5 years | 34.6 years |
Median Income | $61,000 | $50,492 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 1.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Warren vs Augusta
- The population in Augusta is higher at 202,096, compared to 1,705 in Warren.
- Residents in Warren have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 34.6 years in Augusta.
- Warren has a higher median income of $61,000 compared to $50,492 in Augusta.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Warren at 35.0% compared to 25.0% in Augusta.
- The poverty level is higher in Augusta at 18%, compared to 5% in Warren.
- Augusta has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 1.8% in Warren.
Demographics
Demographics Warren vs Augusta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Warren | Augusta |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 56 |
White | 100 | 31 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warren vs Augusta
- In Augusta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 0% in Warren.
- Warren has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 31% in Augusta.
- In Augusta, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Warren.
- Augusta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Warren.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Augusta at 6%, compared to 0% in Warren.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Warren and Augusta at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Warren | Augusta |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.0% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 21.6% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 20.6% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 14.7% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warren vs Augusta
- In Augusta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Augusta at 21.6% versus 0.0% in Warren.
- Augusta has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Augusta at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- Augusta has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Augusta at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Warren | Augusta |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (1,539) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 17.1% (34,505) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 10.8% (21,758) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 15.6% (31,482) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warren vs Augusta
- In Augusta, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- In Augusta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Augusta at 10.8%, compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- In Augusta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.