Demographics details for Warren, VT vs Andrew, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warren, VT vs Andrew, IA.
Data | Warren | Andrew |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,705 | 378 |
Median Age | 41.5 years | 39.8 years |
Median Income | $61,000 | $61,613 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 1.8 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Warren vs Andrew
- In Warren, the population is higher at 1,705, compared to 378 in Andrew.
- Residents in Warren have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 39.8 years in Andrew.
- Andrew has a higher median income of $61,613, compared to $61,000 in Warren.
- In Andrew, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 35.0% in Warren.
- The poverty level is higher in Andrew at 9%, compared to 5% in Warren.
- Andrew has a higher unemployment rate at 2.5% compared to 1.8% in Warren.
Demographics
Demographics Warren vs Andrew provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Warren | Andrew |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 100 | 98 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warren vs Andrew
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Warren and Andrew at 0%.
- Warren has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 98% in Andrew.
- Both Warren and Andrew have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Andrew has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Warren.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Andrew at 1%, compared to 0% in Warren.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Warren and Andrew at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Warren | Andrew |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 9.4% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 18.3% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 17.4% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 23.4% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 35.2% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warren vs Andrew
- In Andrew, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Andrew at 18.3% versus 0.0% in Warren.
- Andrew has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Andrew at 23.4% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- Andrew has higher obesity rates at 35.2% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Andrew at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Warren | Andrew |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 25.1% (95) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 11.6% (44) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 8.5% (32) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warren vs Andrew
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Warren and Andrew at 0.0%.
- In Andrew, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Andrew at 11.6%, compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- In Andrew, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.5% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.