Demographics details for Warner robins, GA vs Sharpsville, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Warner robins, GA vs Sharpsville, IN.

Data Warner robins Sharpsville
Population 82,175 549
Median Age 32.4 years 37.3 years
Median Income $63,678 $88,309
Married Families 32.0% 62.0%
Poverty Level 8% 7%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 3.0

Population Comparison: Warner robins vs Sharpsville

  • In Warner robins, the population is higher at 82,175, compared to 549 in Sharpsville.
  • The median age in Sharpsville is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
  • Sharpsville has a higher median income of $88,309, compared to $63,678 in Warner robins.
  • In Sharpsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
  • Warner robins has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 7% in Sharpsville.
  • The unemployment rate in Warner robins is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.0% in Sharpsville.

Demographics

Demographics Warner robins vs Sharpsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Warner robins Sharpsville
Black 40 1
White 42 92
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 7 2
Two or More Races 7 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Warner robins vs Sharpsville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warner robins at 40% compared to 1% in Sharpsville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sharpsville at 92% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
  • The Asian population is larger in Warner robins at 3% compared to 1% in Sharpsville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Warner robins at 7% compared to 2% in Sharpsville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Warner robins at 7% compared to 4% in Sharpsville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Warner robins at 1% compared to 0% in Sharpsville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Warner robins Sharpsville
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good 13.1% 9.9%
Depression 22.1% 24.9%
Smoking 18.6% 15.9%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 18.2%
Obesity 39.9% 36.7%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Warner robins vs Sharpsville

  • More residents in Warner robins report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.6% in Sharpsville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sharpsville at 24.9% versus 22.1% in Warner robins.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Warner robins at 18.6% compared to 15.9% in Sharpsville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sharpsville at 18.2% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Warner robins at 39.9% compared to 36.7% in Sharpsville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sharpsville at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Warner robins Sharpsville
No Schooling 0.4% (335) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 14.9% (12,260) 27.0% (148)
Less than High School 7.0% (5,714) 8.4% (46)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.2% (15,752) 23.3% (128)

Education Levels Comparison: Warner robins vs Sharpsville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Sharpsville.
  • In Sharpsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.0% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sharpsville at 8.4%, compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
  • In Sharpsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.3% compared to 19.2% in Warner robins.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.