Demographics details for Warner robins, GA vs Newport, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warner robins, GA vs Newport, TN.
Data | Warner robins | Newport |
---|---|---|
Population | 82,175 | 6,901 |
Median Age | 32.4 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $63,678 | $35,784 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Warner robins vs Newport
- In Warner robins, the population is higher at 82,175, compared to 6,901 in Newport.
- The median age in Newport is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher median income of $63,678 compared to $35,784 in Newport.
- In Newport, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
- The poverty level is higher in Newport at 19%, compared to 8% in Warner robins.
- Newport has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.8% in Warner robins.
Demographics
Demographics Warner robins vs Newport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Warner robins | Newport |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | 1 |
White | 42 | 84 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warner robins vs Newport
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warner robins at 40% compared to 1% in Newport.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Newport at 84% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
- The Asian population is larger in Warner robins at 3% compared to 2% in Newport.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Warner robins at 7% compared to 5% in Newport.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Newport at 8%, compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Warner robins at 1% compared to 0% in Newport.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Warner robins | Newport |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 22.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 16.6% |
Depression | 22.1% | 31.2% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 28.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 13.6% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warner robins vs Newport
- In Newport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.4% compared to 17.6% in Warner robins.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Newport at 31.2% versus 22.1% in Warner robins.
- Newport has a higher smoking rate at 28.4% compared to 18.6% in Warner robins.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warner robins at 15.9% compared to 13.6% in Newport.
- Newport has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 39.9% in Warner robins.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Newport at 26.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Warner robins | Newport |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (335) | 0.3% (23) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (12,260) | 23.4% (1,613) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (5,714) | 21.6% (1,490) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.2% (15,752) | 7.5% (519) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warner robins vs Newport
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Newport.
- In Newport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Newport at 21.6%, compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 7.5% in Newport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.