Demographics details for Warner robins, GA vs Mendenhall, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Warner robins, GA vs Mendenhall, MS.

Data Warner robins Mendenhall
Population 82,175 2,148
Median Age 32.4 years 39.0 years
Median Income $63,678 $35,956
Married Families 32.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 8% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 5.5

Population Comparison: Warner robins vs Mendenhall

  • In Warner robins, the population is higher at 82,175, compared to 2,148 in Mendenhall.
  • The median age in Mendenhall is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
  • Warner robins has a higher median income of $63,678 compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Warner robins at 32.0% compared to 31.0% in Mendenhall.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mendenhall at 20%, compared to 8% in Warner robins.
  • Mendenhall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.8% in Warner robins.

Demographics

Demographics Warner robins vs Mendenhall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Warner robins Mendenhall
Black 40 65
White 42 34
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 1
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Warner robins vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 40% in Warner robins.
  • Warner robins has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
  • The Asian population is larger in Warner robins at 3% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Warner robins at 7% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Warner robins at 7% compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Warner robins at 1% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Warner robins Mendenhall
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.1% 14.6%
Depression 22.1% 24.8%
Smoking 18.6% 24.5%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 13.7%
Obesity 39.9% 46.3%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Warner robins vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.6% in Warner robins.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mendenhall at 24.8% versus 22.1% in Warner robins.
  • Mendenhall has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 18.6% in Warner robins.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Warner robins at 15.9% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
  • Mendenhall has higher obesity rates at 46.3% compared to 39.9% in Warner robins.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Warner robins Mendenhall
No Schooling 0.4% (335) 0.7% (16)
High School Diploma 14.9% (12,260) 17.9% (385)
Less than High School 7.0% (5,714) 20.7% (445)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.2% (15,752) 18.4% (395)

Education Levels Comparison: Warner robins vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Warner robins.
  • In Mendenhall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mendenhall at 20.7%, compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 18.4% in Mendenhall.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.