Demographics details for Warner robins, GA vs Holt, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warner robins, GA vs Holt, MO.
Data | Warner robins | Holt |
---|---|---|
Population | 82,175 | 4,262 |
Median Age | 32.4 years | 47.8 years |
Median Income | $63,678 | $55,153 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Warner robins vs Holt
- In Warner robins, the population is higher at 82,175, compared to 4,262 in Holt.
- The median age in Holt is higher at 47.8 years, compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher median income of $63,678 compared to $55,153 in Holt.
- In Holt, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Holt.
- Holt has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.8% in Warner robins.
Demographics
Demographics Warner robins vs Holt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Warner robins | Holt |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | 1 |
White | 42 | 94 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 7 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warner robins vs Holt
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warner robins at 40% compared to 1% in Holt.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Holt at 94% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
- The Asian population is larger in Warner robins at 3% compared to 1% in Holt.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Warner robins at 7% compared to 1% in Holt.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Warner robins at 7% compared to 3% in Holt.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Warner robins at 1% compared to 0% in Holt.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Warner robins | Holt |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 12.5% |
Depression | 22.1% | 24.9% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 20.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 40.1% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warner robins vs Holt
- In Holt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Warner robins.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Holt at 24.9% versus 22.1% in Warner robins.
- Holt has a higher smoking rate at 20.7% compared to 18.6% in Warner robins.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Holt at 17.9% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
- Holt has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 39.9% in Warner robins.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Holt at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Warner robins | Holt |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (335) | 0.4% (17) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (12,260) | 30.4% (1,294) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (5,714) | 9.1% (389) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.2% (15,752) | 15.4% (658) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warner robins vs Holt
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Warner robins and Holt at 0.4%.
- In Holt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.4% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Holt at 9.1%, compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 15.4% in Holt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.