Demographics details for Warner robins, GA vs Hanapepe, HI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warner robins, GA vs Hanapepe, HI.
Data | Warner robins | Hanapepe |
---|---|---|
Population | 82,175 | 2,242 |
Median Age | 32.4 years | 43.1 years |
Median Income | $63,678 | $88,385 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 2.4 |
Population Comparison: Warner robins vs Hanapepe
- In Warner robins, the population is higher at 82,175, compared to 2,242 in Hanapepe.
- The median age in Hanapepe is higher at 43.1 years, compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Hanapepe has a higher median income of $88,385, compared to $63,678 in Warner robins.
- In Hanapepe, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
- The poverty level is identical in both Warner robins and Hanapepe at 8%.
- The unemployment rate in Warner robins is higher at 3.8%, compared to 2.4% in Hanapepe.
Demographics
Demographics Warner robins vs Hanapepe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Warner robins | Hanapepe |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | Data is updating |
White | 42 | 28 |
Asian | 3 | 49 |
Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 19 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warner robins vs Hanapepe
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warner robins at 40% compared to 0% in Hanapepe.
- Warner robins has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 28% in Hanapepe.
- In Hanapepe, the Asian population stands at 49%, greater than 3% in Warner robins.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Warner robins at 7% compared to 4% in Hanapepe.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hanapepe at 19%, compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Warner robins at 1% compared to 0% in Hanapepe.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Warner robins | Hanapepe |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 9.9% |
Depression | 22.1% | 13.8% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 23.2% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warner robins vs Hanapepe
- More residents in Warner robins report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.9% in Hanapepe.
- Depression is more prevalent in Warner robins at 22.1% compared to 13.8% in Hanapepe.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Warner robins at 18.6% compared to 15.8% in Hanapepe.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hanapepe at 17.2% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
- Obesity rates are higher in Warner robins at 39.9% compared to 23.2% in Hanapepe.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hanapepe at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Warner robins | Hanapepe |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (335) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (12,260) | 42.2% (946) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (5,714) | 7.8% (174) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.2% (15,752) | 12.8% (286) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warner robins vs Hanapepe
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Hanapepe.
- In Hanapepe, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 42.2% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hanapepe at 7.8%, compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 12.8% in Hanapepe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.