Demographics details for Warner robins, GA vs Hanapepe, HI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Warner robins, GA vs Hanapepe, HI.

Data Warner robins Hanapepe
Population 82,175 2,242
Median Age 32.4 years 43.1 years
Median Income $63,678 $88,385
Married Families 32.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 8% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 2.4

Population Comparison: Warner robins vs Hanapepe

  • In Warner robins, the population is higher at 82,175, compared to 2,242 in Hanapepe.
  • The median age in Hanapepe is higher at 43.1 years, compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
  • Hanapepe has a higher median income of $88,385, compared to $63,678 in Warner robins.
  • In Hanapepe, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Warner robins and Hanapepe at 8%.
  • The unemployment rate in Warner robins is higher at 3.8%, compared to 2.4% in Hanapepe.

Demographics

Demographics Warner robins vs Hanapepe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Warner robins Hanapepe
Black 40 Data is updating
White 42 28
Asian 3 49
Hispanic 7 4
Two or More Races 7 19
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Warner robins vs Hanapepe

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warner robins at 40% compared to 0% in Hanapepe.
  • Warner robins has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 28% in Hanapepe.
  • In Hanapepe, the Asian population stands at 49%, greater than 3% in Warner robins.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Warner robins at 7% compared to 4% in Hanapepe.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hanapepe at 19%, compared to 7% in Warner robins.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Warner robins at 1% compared to 0% in Hanapepe.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Warner robins Hanapepe
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 14.9%
Physical Health Not Good 13.1% 9.9%
Depression 22.1% 13.8%
Smoking 18.6% 15.8%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 17.2%
Obesity 39.9% 23.2%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Warner robins vs Hanapepe

  • More residents in Warner robins report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.9% in Hanapepe.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Warner robins at 22.1% compared to 13.8% in Hanapepe.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Warner robins at 18.6% compared to 15.8% in Hanapepe.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Hanapepe at 17.2% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Warner robins at 39.9% compared to 23.2% in Hanapepe.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hanapepe at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Warner robins Hanapepe
No Schooling 0.4% (335) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 14.9% (12,260) 42.2% (946)
Less than High School 7.0% (5,714) 7.8% (174)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.2% (15,752) 12.8% (286)

Education Levels Comparison: Warner robins vs Hanapepe

  • A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Hanapepe.
  • In Hanapepe, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 42.2% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hanapepe at 7.8%, compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 12.8% in Hanapepe.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.