Demographics details for Warner robins, GA vs Gentry, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warner robins, GA vs Gentry, AR.
Data | Warner robins | Gentry |
---|---|---|
Population | 82,175 | 4,209 |
Median Age | 32.4 years | 35.0 years |
Median Income | $63,678 | $62,981 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Warner robins vs Gentry
- In Warner robins, the population is higher at 82,175, compared to 4,209 in Gentry.
- The median age in Gentry is higher at 35.0 years, compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher median income of $63,678 compared to $62,981 in Gentry.
- In Gentry, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
- The poverty level is higher in Gentry at 11%, compared to 8% in Warner robins.
- The unemployment rate in Warner robins is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Gentry.
Demographics
Demographics Warner robins vs Gentry provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Warner robins | Gentry |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | Data is updating |
White | 42 | 56 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 7 | 21 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 20 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Warner robins vs Gentry
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warner robins at 40% compared to 0% in Gentry.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gentry at 56% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
- The Asian population is larger in Warner robins at 3% compared to 2% in Gentry.
- Gentry has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gentry at 20%, compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Warner robins and Gentry at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Warner robins | Gentry |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.2% |
Depression | 22.1% | 25.2% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 19.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 36.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warner robins vs Gentry
- In Gentry, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.6% in Warner robins.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gentry at 25.2% versus 22.1% in Warner robins.
- Gentry has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 18.6% in Warner robins.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warner robins at 15.9% compared to 15.6% in Gentry.
- Obesity rates are higher in Warner robins at 39.9% compared to 36.5% in Gentry.
- Disability percentages are higher in Warner robins at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Gentry.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Warner robins | Gentry |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (335) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (12,260) | 19.1% (806) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (5,714) | 13.3% (561) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.2% (15,752) | 11.6% (489) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warner robins vs Gentry
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Gentry.
- In Gentry, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gentry at 13.3%, compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 11.6% in Gentry.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.