Demographics details for Warner robins, GA vs Flint, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warner robins, GA vs Flint, MI.
| Data | Warner robins | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82,175 | 79,854 |
| Median Age | 32.4 years | 36.1 years |
| Median Income | $63,678 | $35,451 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 32% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 10.4 |
Population Comparison: Warner robins vs Flint
- In Warner robins, the population is higher at 82,175, compared to 79,854 in Flint.
- The median age in Flint is higher at 36.1 years, compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher median income of $63,678 compared to $35,451 in Flint.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Warner robins at 32.0% compared to 20.0% in Flint.
- The poverty level is higher in Flint at 32%, compared to 8% in Warner robins.
- Flint has a higher unemployment rate at 10.4% compared to 3.8% in Warner robins.
Demographics
Demographics Warner robins vs Flint provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Warner robins | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | 58 |
| White | 42 | 30 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warner robins vs Flint
- In Flint, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 40% in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 30% in Flint.
- The Asian population is larger in Warner robins at 3% compared to 1% in Flint.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Warner robins at 7% compared to 4% in Flint.
- Both Warner robins and Flint have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Warner robins at 1% compared to 0% in Flint.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Warner robins | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 17.3% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 29.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 51.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warner robins vs Flint
- In Flint, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 17.6% in Warner robins.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flint at 25.6% versus 22.1% in Warner robins.
- Flint has a higher smoking rate at 29.5% compared to 18.6% in Warner robins.
- Binge drinking is more common in Warner robins at 15.9% compared to 14.0% in Flint.
- Flint has higher obesity rates at 51.7% compared to 39.9% in Warner robins.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flint at 25.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Warner robins | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (335) | 0.8% (629) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (12,260) | 20.2% (16,121) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (5,714) | 15.3% (12,181) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.2% (15,752) | 8.3% (6,616) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warner robins vs Flint
- In Flint, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Warner robins.
- In Flint, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flint at 15.3%, compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 8.3% in Flint.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.