Demographics details for Warner robins, GA vs Eureka, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warner robins, GA vs Eureka, MO.
| Data | Warner robins | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82,175 | 12,729 |
| Median Age | 32.4 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $63,678 | $104,697 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Warner robins vs Eureka
- In Warner robins, the population is higher at 82,175, compared to 12,729 in Eureka.
- The median age in Eureka is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Eureka has a higher median income of $104,697, compared to $63,678 in Warner robins.
- In Eureka, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Eureka.
- The unemployment rate in Warner robins is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
Demographics
Demographics Warner robins vs Eureka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Warner robins | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | Data is updating |
| White | 42 | 88 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warner robins vs Eureka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warner robins at 40% compared to 0% in Eureka.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Eureka at 88% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
- The Asian population is larger in Warner robins at 3% compared to 2% in Eureka.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Warner robins at 7% compared to 2% in Eureka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Eureka at 8%, compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Warner robins at 1% compared to 0% in Eureka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Warner robins | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 21.9% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 30.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warner robins vs Eureka
- More residents in Warner robins report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.2% in Eureka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Eureka at 22.8% versus 22.1% in Warner robins.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Warner robins at 18.6% compared to 14.1% in Eureka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Eureka at 21.9% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
- Obesity rates are higher in Warner robins at 39.9% compared to 30.0% in Eureka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Warner robins at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Eureka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Warner robins | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (335) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (12,260) | 10.5% (1,337) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (5,714) | 3.2% (405) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.2% (15,752) | 30.1% (3,835) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warner robins vs Eureka
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Eureka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 10.5% in Eureka.
- More residents in Warner robins have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
- In Eureka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 19.2% in Warner robins.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.