Demographics details for Warner robins, GA vs Culver city, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Warner robins, GA vs Culver city, CA.

Data Warner robins Culver city
Population 82,175 39,515
Median Age 32.4 years 41.5 years
Median Income $63,678 $114,429
Married Families 32.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 8% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 5.8

Population Comparison: Warner robins vs Culver city

  • In Warner robins, the population is higher at 82,175, compared to 39,515 in Culver city.
  • The median age in Culver city is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
  • Culver city has a higher median income of $114,429, compared to $63,678 in Warner robins.
  • In Culver city, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
  • The poverty level is higher in Culver city at 9%, compared to 8% in Warner robins.
  • Culver city has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.8% in Warner robins.

Demographics

Demographics Warner robins vs Culver city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Warner robins Culver city
Black 40 8
White 42 38
Asian 3 18
Hispanic 7 21
Two or More Races 7 15
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Warner robins vs Culver city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warner robins at 40% compared to 8% in Culver city.
  • Warner robins has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 38% in Culver city.
  • In Culver city, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 3% in Warner robins.
  • Culver city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 7% in Warner robins.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Culver city at 15%, compared to 7% in Warner robins.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Warner robins at 1% compared to 0% in Culver city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Warner robins Culver city
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 13.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.1% 8.1%
Depression 22.1% 15.2%
Smoking 18.6% 7.5%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 16.5%
Obesity 39.9% 24.1%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Warner robins vs Culver city

  • More residents in Warner robins report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 13.1% in Culver city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Warner robins at 22.1% compared to 15.2% in Culver city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Warner robins at 18.6% compared to 7.5% in Culver city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Culver city at 16.5% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Warner robins at 39.9% compared to 24.1% in Culver city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Warner robins at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Culver city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Warner robins Culver city
No Schooling 0.4% (335) 1.3% (501)
High School Diploma 14.9% (12,260) 7.6% (3,000)
Less than High School 7.0% (5,714) 9.1% (3,605)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.2% (15,752) 49.0% (19,344)

Education Levels Comparison: Warner robins vs Culver city

  • In Culver city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Warner robins.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 7.6% in Culver city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Culver city at 9.1%, compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
  • In Culver city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.0% compared to 19.2% in Warner robins.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.