Demographics details for Warner robins, GA vs Centralia, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warner robins, GA vs Centralia, WA.
Data | Warner robins | Centralia |
---|---|---|
Population | 82,175 | 18,773 |
Median Age | 32.4 years | 38.5 years |
Median Income | $63,678 | $50,422 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Warner robins vs Centralia
- In Warner robins, the population is higher at 82,175, compared to 18,773 in Centralia.
- The median age in Centralia is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher median income of $63,678 compared to $50,422 in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Warner robins at 32.0% compared to 28.0% in Centralia.
- The poverty level is higher in Centralia at 14%, compared to 8% in Warner robins.
- Centralia has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.8% in Warner robins.
Demographics
Demographics Warner robins vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Warner robins | Centralia |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | 1 |
White | 42 | 70 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 7 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warner robins vs Centralia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warner robins at 40% compared to 1% in Centralia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Centralia at 70% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
- The Asian population is larger in Warner robins at 3% compared to 1% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Centralia at 11%, compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Warner robins at 1% compared to 0% in Centralia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Warner robins | Centralia |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.5% |
Depression | 22.1% | 27.5% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 19.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 36.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warner robins vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.6% in Warner robins.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 27.5% versus 22.1% in Warner robins.
- Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Warner robins.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Warner robins and Centralia at 15.9%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Warner robins at 39.9% compared to 36.5% in Centralia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Warner robins | Centralia |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (335) | 1.1% (214) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (12,260) | 17.6% (3,312) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (5,714) | 19.3% (3,617) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.2% (15,752) | 11.6% (2,187) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warner robins vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Warner robins.
- In Centralia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Centralia at 19.3%, compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 11.6% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.