Demographics details for Warner robins, GA vs Byers, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warner robins, GA vs Byers, CO.
Data | Warner robins | Byers |
---|---|---|
Population | 82,175 | 1,635 |
Median Age | 32.4 years | 29.4 years |
Median Income | $63,678 | $93,750 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Warner robins vs Byers
- In Warner robins, the population is higher at 82,175, compared to 1,635 in Byers.
- Residents in Warner robins have a higher median age of 32.4 years compared to 29.4 years in Byers.
- Byers has a higher median income of $93,750, compared to $63,678 in Warner robins.
- In Byers, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Byers.
- The unemployment rate in Warner robins is higher at 3.8%, compared to 2.5% in Byers.
Demographics
Demographics Warner robins vs Byers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Warner robins | Byers |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | Data is updating |
White | 42 | 20 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 43 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 36 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Warner robins vs Byers
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warner robins at 40% compared to 0% in Byers.
- Warner robins has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 20% in Byers.
- The Asian population is larger in Warner robins at 3% compared to 0% in Byers.
- Byers has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Byers at 36%, compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Warner robins and Byers at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Warner robins | Byers |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 10.0% |
Depression | 22.1% | 22.4% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 16.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 20.1% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 25.6% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warner robins vs Byers
- More residents in Warner robins report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.9% in Byers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Byers at 22.4% versus 22.1% in Warner robins.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Warner robins at 18.6% compared to 16.2% in Byers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Byers at 20.1% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
- Obesity rates are higher in Warner robins at 39.9% compared to 25.6% in Byers.
- Disability percentages are higher in Warner robins at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Byers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Warner robins | Byers |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (335) | 1.0% (17) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (12,260) | 16.5% (270) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (5,714) | 8.0% (130) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.2% (15,752) | 7.8% (128) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warner robins vs Byers
- In Byers, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Warner robins.
- In Byers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.5% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Byers at 8.0%, compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 7.8% in Byers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.