Demographics details for Warner robins, GA vs Anamosa, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Warner robins, GA vs Anamosa, IA.
Data | Warner robins | Anamosa |
---|---|---|
Population | 82,175 | 5,521 |
Median Age | 32.4 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $63,678 | $55,934 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Warner robins vs Anamosa
- In Warner robins, the population is higher at 82,175, compared to 5,521 in Anamosa.
- The median age in Anamosa is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher median income of $63,678 compared to $55,934 in Anamosa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Warner robins at 32.0% compared to 30.0% in Anamosa.
- The poverty level is identical in both Warner robins and Anamosa at 8%.
- The unemployment rate in Warner robins is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Anamosa.
Demographics
Demographics Warner robins vs Anamosa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Warner robins | Anamosa |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | 6 |
White | 42 | 87 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 7 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Warner robins vs Anamosa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Warner robins at 40% compared to 6% in Anamosa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Anamosa at 87% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
- The Asian population is larger in Warner robins at 3% compared to 2% in Anamosa.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Warner robins at 7% compared to 2% in Anamosa.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Warner robins at 7% compared to 3% in Anamosa.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Warner robins at 1% compared to 0% in Anamosa.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Warner robins | Anamosa |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 16.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 11.1% |
Depression | 22.1% | 18.7% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 21.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 21.0% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 45.0% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Warner robins vs Anamosa
- More residents in Warner robins report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.0% in Anamosa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Warner robins at 22.1% compared to 18.7% in Anamosa.
- Anamosa has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 18.6% in Warner robins.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Anamosa at 21.0% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
- Anamosa has higher obesity rates at 45.0% compared to 39.9% in Warner robins.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Anamosa at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Warner robins | Anamosa |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (335) | 0.2% (13) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (12,260) | 22.3% (1,229) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (5,714) | 10.5% (581) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.2% (15,752) | 13.5% (747) |
Education Levels Comparison: Warner robins vs Anamosa
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Anamosa.
- In Anamosa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Anamosa at 10.5%, compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Warner robins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 13.5% in Anamosa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.