Demographics details for Wappingers falls, NY vs Fontana, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wappingers falls, NY vs Fontana, CA.

Data Wappingers falls Fontana
Population 6,064 212,475
Median Age 47.9 years 32.6 years
Median Income $61,554 $93,230
Married Families 32.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 5% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Wappingers falls vs Fontana

  • The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 6,064 in Wappingers falls.
  • Residents in Wappingers falls have a higher median age of 47.9 years compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
  • Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $61,554 in Wappingers falls.
  • In Fontana, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 32.0% in Wappingers falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fontana at 13%, compared to 5% in Wappingers falls.
  • Fontana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Wappingers falls.

Demographics

Demographics Wappingers falls vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wappingers falls Fontana
Black 13 8
White 61 2
Asian 3 7
Hispanic 20 68
Two or More Races 3 14
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Wappingers falls vs Fontana

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wappingers falls at 13% compared to 8% in Fontana.
  • Wappingers falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 2% in Fontana.
  • In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Wappingers falls.
  • Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 20% in Wappingers falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 3% in Wappingers falls.
  • In Fontana, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Wappingers falls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wappingers falls Fontana
Mental Health Not Good 16.5% 16.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 12.6%
Depression 22.8% 17.0%
Smoking 20.1% 12.4%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 15.1%
Obesity 34.7% 38.6%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wappingers falls vs Fontana

  • More residents in Wappingers falls report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.2% in Fontana.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Wappingers falls at 22.8% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Wappingers falls at 20.1% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Wappingers falls at 16.4% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
  • Fontana has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 34.7% in Wappingers falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Wappingers falls at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wappingers falls Fontana
No Schooling 0.9% (57) 2.2% (4,748)
High School Diploma 18.1% (1,099) 16.3% (34,556)
Less than High School 24.9% (1,511) 25.3% (53,655)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.2% (861) 12.0% (25,587)

Education Levels Comparison: Wappingers falls vs Fontana

  • In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.9% in Wappingers falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wappingers falls hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 16.3% in Fontana.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 24.9% in Wappingers falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wappingers falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.