Demographics details for Wappingers falls, NY vs Carthage, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wappingers falls, NY vs Carthage, TX.

Data Wappingers falls Carthage
Population 6,064 6,562
Median Age 47.9 years 36.4 years
Median Income $61,554 $42,788
Married Families 32.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 5% 19%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Wappingers falls vs Carthage

  • The population in Carthage is higher at 6,562, compared to 6,064 in Wappingers falls.
  • Residents in Wappingers falls have a higher median age of 47.9 years compared to 36.4 years in Carthage.
  • Wappingers falls has a higher median income of $61,554 compared to $42,788 in Carthage.
  • In Carthage, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 32.0% in Wappingers falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 19%, compared to 5% in Wappingers falls.
  • Carthage has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Wappingers falls.

Demographics

Demographics Wappingers falls vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wappingers falls Carthage
Black 13 12
White 61 59
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 20 17
Two or More Races 3 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Wappingers falls vs Carthage

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wappingers falls at 13% compared to 12% in Carthage.
  • Wappingers falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 59% in Carthage.
  • The Asian population is larger in Wappingers falls at 3% compared to 1% in Carthage.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Wappingers falls at 20% compared to 17% in Carthage.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carthage at 11%, compared to 3% in Wappingers falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wappingers falls and Carthage at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wappingers falls Carthage
Mental Health Not Good 16.5% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 13.0%
Depression 22.8% 24.6%
Smoking 20.1% 19.6%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 17.2%
Obesity 34.7% 42.1%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wappingers falls vs Carthage

  • In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.5% in Wappingers falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 24.6% versus 22.8% in Wappingers falls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Wappingers falls at 20.1% compared to 19.6% in Carthage.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Carthage at 17.2% compared to 16.4% in Wappingers falls.
  • Carthage has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 34.7% in Wappingers falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Wappingers falls at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Carthage.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wappingers falls Carthage
No Schooling 0.9% (57) 2.3% (148)
High School Diploma 18.1% (1,099) 10.7% (705)
Less than High School 24.9% (1,511) 20.5% (1,343)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.2% (861) 9.1% (600)

Education Levels Comparison: Wappingers falls vs Carthage

  • In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.9% in Wappingers falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wappingers falls hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 10.7% in Carthage.
  • More residents in Wappingers falls have less than a high school education at 24.9% compared to 20.5% in Carthage.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wappingers falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 9.1% in Carthage.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.