Demographics details for Wapakoneta, OH vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wapakoneta, OH vs Spanish fork, UT.
| Data | Wapakoneta | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,776 | 44,102 |
| Median Age | 41.6 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $63,008 | $93,989 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Wapakoneta vs Spanish fork
- The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 9,776 in Wapakoneta.
- Residents in Wapakoneta have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $63,008 in Wapakoneta.
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 42.0% in Wapakoneta.
- Wapakoneta has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- The unemployment rate in Wapakoneta is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.
Demographics
Demographics Wapakoneta vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wapakoneta | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 89 | 80 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wapakoneta vs Spanish fork
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Wapakoneta and Spanish fork at 1%.
- Wapakoneta has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
- Both Wapakoneta and Spanish fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 5% in Wapakoneta.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spanish fork at 7%, compared to 5% in Wapakoneta.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wapakoneta and Spanish fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wapakoneta | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 7.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 8.3% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wapakoneta vs Spanish fork
- More residents in Wapakoneta report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 23.8%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wapakoneta at 21.3% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wapakoneta at 18.8% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wapakoneta at 38.8% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wapakoneta at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wapakoneta | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (9) | 0.4% (175) |
| High School Diploma | 26.9% (2,625) | 9.1% (4,010) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (1,157) | 5.9% (2,583) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.0% (1,364) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wapakoneta vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Wapakoneta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wapakoneta hold a high school diploma at 26.9% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- More residents in Wapakoneta have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 14.0% in Wapakoneta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.