Demographics details for Wanette, OK vs Central point, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wanette, OK vs Central point, OR.
| Data | Wanette | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 281 | 19,222 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $39,063 | $79,731 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Wanette vs Central point
- The population in Central point is higher at 19,222, compared to 281 in Wanette.
- Residents in Wanette have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731, compared to $39,063 in Wanette.
- In Central point, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 24.0% in Wanette.
- Wanette has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Central point.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Wanette and Central point at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Wanette vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wanette | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 81 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | 14 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Wanette vs Central point
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Wanette and Central point at 0%.
- Wanette has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 76% in Central point.
- In Central point, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Wanette.
- Central point has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Wanette.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central point at 7%, compared to 5% in Wanette.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wanette at 14% compared to 1% in Central point.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wanette | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.6% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 29.4% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 42.4% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wanette vs Central point
- More residents in Wanette report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 19.4% in Central point.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 26.2% in Wanette.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wanette at 23.1% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central point at 16.5% compared to 14.6% in Wanette.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wanette at 42.4% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wanette at 31.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wanette | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (5) | 1.7% (319) |
| High School Diploma | 22.4% (63) | 16.1% (3,095) |
| Less than High School | 21.4% (60) | 13.2% (2,530) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (19) | 15.6% (3,003) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wanette vs Central point
- A higher percentage of residents in Wanette have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.7% in Central point.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wanette hold a high school diploma at 22.4% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
- More residents in Wanette have less than a high school education at 21.4% compared to 13.2% in Central point.
- In Central point, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 6.8% in Wanette.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.