Demographics details for Walstonburg, NC vs Gresham, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Walstonburg, NC vs Gresham, OR.
| Data | Walstonburg | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 194 | 111,621 |
| Median Age | 42.1 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $40,000 | $69,437 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Walstonburg vs Gresham
- The population in Gresham is higher at 111,621, compared to 194 in Walstonburg.
- Residents in Walstonburg have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 37.3 years in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437, compared to $40,000 in Walstonburg.
- In Gresham, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Walstonburg.
- Walstonburg has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Gresham.
- The unemployment rate in Walstonburg is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.9% in Gresham.
Demographics
Demographics Walstonburg vs Gresham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Walstonburg | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 4 |
| White | 60 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 13 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Walstonburg vs Gresham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Walstonburg at 34% compared to 4% in Gresham.
- Walstonburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- In Gresham, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Walstonburg.
- Gresham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 1% in Walstonburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gresham at 13%, compared to 3% in Walstonburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Walstonburg at 2% compared to 1% in Gresham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Walstonburg | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 23.6% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 41.2% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 32.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Walstonburg vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 19.1% in Walstonburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gresham at 28.4% versus 25.8% in Walstonburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Walstonburg at 23.6% compared to 17.6% in Gresham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 16.3% in Walstonburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Walstonburg at 41.2% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Walstonburg at 32.0% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Walstonburg | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (1) | 1.6% (1,757) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (29) | 15.0% (16,776) |
| Less than High School | 9.8% (19) | 16.5% (18,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (33) | 16.2% (18,082) |
Education Levels Comparison: Walstonburg vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in Walstonburg.
- In Gresham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 14.9% in Walstonburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gresham at 16.5%, compared to 9.8% in Walstonburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Walstonburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 16.2% in Gresham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.