Demographics details for Walnut bottom, PA vs Hornick, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Walnut bottom, PA vs Hornick, IA.

Data Walnut bottom Hornick
Population 422 253
Median Age 37.0 years 32.8 years
Median Income $55,000 $78,750
Married Families 50.0% 51.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.0

Population Comparison: Walnut bottom vs Hornick

  • In Walnut bottom, the population is higher at 422, compared to 253 in Hornick.
  • Residents in Walnut bottom have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 32.8 years in Hornick.
  • Hornick has a higher median income of $78,750, compared to $55,000 in Walnut bottom.
  • In Hornick, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 50.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Walnut bottom has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Hornick.
  • The unemployment rate in Walnut bottom is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.0% in Hornick.

Demographics

Demographics Walnut bottom vs Hornick provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Walnut bottom Hornick
Black 1 Data is updating
White 98 96
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 1
Two or More Races Data is updating 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Walnut bottom vs Hornick

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Walnut bottom at 1% compared to 0% in Hornick.
  • Walnut bottom has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 96% in Hornick.
  • Both Walnut bottom and Hornick have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Walnut bottom and Hornick at 1%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hornick at 3%, compared to 0% in Walnut bottom.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Walnut bottom and Hornick at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Walnut bottom Hornick
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.9%
Depression Data is updating% 20.4%
Smoking Data is updating% 18.3%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 23.2%
Obesity Data is updating% 36.5%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 4.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Walnut bottom vs Hornick

  • In Hornick, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Hornick at 20.4% versus 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Hornick has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Hornick at 23.2% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Hornick has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hornick at 4.0% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Walnut bottom Hornick
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 24.9% (63)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.9% (30)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 4.7% (12)

Education Levels Comparison: Walnut bottom vs Hornick

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Walnut bottom and Hornick at 0.0%.
  • In Hornick, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hornick at 11.9%, compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • In Hornick, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 4.7% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.