Demographics details for Walnut bottom, PA vs Fremont, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Walnut bottom, PA vs Fremont, CA.

Data Walnut bottom Fremont
Population 422 223,871
Median Age 37.0 years 38.6 years
Median Income $55,000 $169,023
Married Families 50.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.4

Population Comparison: Walnut bottom vs Fremont

  • The population in Fremont is higher at 223,871, compared to 422 in Walnut bottom.
  • The median age in Fremont is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 37.0 years in Walnut bottom.
  • Fremont has a higher median income of $169,023, compared to $55,000 in Walnut bottom.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Walnut bottom and Fremont at 50.0%.
  • Walnut bottom has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Fremont.
  • The unemployment rate in Walnut bottom is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.4% in Fremont.

Demographics

Demographics Walnut bottom vs Fremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Walnut bottom Fremont
Black 1 3
White 98 15
Asian Data is updating 63
Hispanic 1 12
Two or More Races Data is updating 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Walnut bottom vs Fremont

  • In Fremont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Walnut bottom.
  • Walnut bottom has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 15% in Fremont.
  • In Fremont, the Asian population stands at 63%, greater than 0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Fremont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 1% in Walnut bottom.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fremont at 7%, compared to 0% in Walnut bottom.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Walnut bottom and Fremont at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Walnut bottom Fremont
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 12.1%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 7.1%
Depression Data is updating% 14.3%
Smoking Data is updating% 7.3%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.3%
Obesity Data is updating% 20.3%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Walnut bottom vs Fremont

  • In Fremont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 12.1% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fremont at 14.3% versus 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Fremont has a higher smoking rate at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fremont at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Fremont has higher obesity rates at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fremont at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Walnut bottom Fremont
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.4% (3,191)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 9.7% (21,668)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.2% (16,158)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 45.0% (100,683)

Education Levels Comparison: Walnut bottom vs Fremont

  • In Fremont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • In Fremont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.7% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fremont at 7.2%, compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • In Fremont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.0% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.