Demographics details for Walnut bottom, PA vs Crawford, NE

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Walnut bottom, PA vs Crawford, NE.

Data Walnut bottom Crawford
Population 422 838
Median Age 37.0 years 52.1 years
Median Income $55,000 $54,167
Married Families 50.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Walnut bottom vs Crawford

  • The population in Crawford is higher at 838, compared to 422 in Walnut bottom.
  • The median age in Crawford is higher at 52.1 years, compared to 37.0 years in Walnut bottom.
  • Walnut bottom has a higher median income of $55,000 compared to $54,167 in Crawford.
  • In Crawford, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 50.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Walnut bottom and Crawford at 10%.
  • The unemployment rate in Walnut bottom is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Crawford.

Demographics

Demographics Walnut bottom vs Crawford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Walnut bottom Crawford
Black 1 Data is updating
White 98 76
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 15
Two or More Races Data is updating 3
American Indian Data is updating 6

Demographics Comparison: Walnut bottom vs Crawford

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Walnut bottom at 1% compared to 0% in Crawford.
  • Walnut bottom has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 76% in Crawford.
  • Both Walnut bottom and Crawford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Crawford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 1% in Walnut bottom.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crawford at 3%, compared to 0% in Walnut bottom.
  • In Crawford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Walnut bottom.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Walnut bottom Crawford
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.8%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.4%
Depression Data is updating% 18.9%
Smoking Data is updating% 15.7%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 20.0%
Obesity Data is updating% 40.3%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Walnut bottom vs Crawford

  • In Crawford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Crawford at 18.9% versus 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Crawford has a higher smoking rate at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Crawford has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crawford at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Walnut bottom Crawford
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.6% (5)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 30.2% (253)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 6.0% (50)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.1% (143)

Education Levels Comparison: Walnut bottom vs Crawford

  • In Crawford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • In Crawford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.2% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crawford at 6.0%, compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • In Crawford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.