Demographics details for Wallsburg, UT vs Garland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wallsburg, UT vs Garland, TX.
| Data | Wallsburg | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 297 | 240,854 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $99,500 | $71,044 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Wallsburg vs Garland
- The population in Garland is higher at 240,854, compared to 297 in Wallsburg.
- Residents in Wallsburg have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 34.4 years in Garland.
- Wallsburg has a higher median income of $99,500 compared to $71,044 in Garland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wallsburg at 53.0% compared to 39.0% in Garland.
- The poverty level is higher in Garland at 12%, compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- Garland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.5% in Wallsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Wallsburg vs Garland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wallsburg | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 16 |
| White | 93 | 6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 11 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 45 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Wallsburg vs Garland
- In Garland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- Wallsburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 6% in Garland.
- In Garland, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Wallsburg.
- Garland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 7% in Wallsburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garland at 21%, compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- In Garland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wallsburg | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 9.1% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 28.0% | 33.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wallsburg vs Garland
- In Garland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.3% in Wallsburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wallsburg at 22.8% compared to 22.2% in Garland.
- Garland has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 9.1% in Wallsburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Garland at 17.6% compared to 13.2% in Wallsburg.
- Garland has higher obesity rates at 33.9% compared to 28.0% in Wallsburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wallsburg at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Garland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wallsburg | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.5% (6,080) |
| High School Diploma | 27.6% (82) | 13.9% (33,524) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (22) | 24.7% (59,406) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (28) | 15.5% (37,249) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wallsburg vs Garland
- In Garland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Wallsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wallsburg hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 13.9% in Garland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garland at 24.7%, compared to 7.4% in Wallsburg.
- In Garland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 9.4% in Wallsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.