Demographics details for Wallsburg, UT vs Federal way, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wallsburg, UT vs Federal way, WA.

Data Wallsburg Federal way
Population 297 97,863
Median Age 40.9 years 37.4 years
Median Income $99,500 $80,360
Married Families 53.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 9%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 5.7

Population Comparison: Wallsburg vs Federal way

  • The population in Federal way is higher at 97,863, compared to 297 in Wallsburg.
  • Residents in Wallsburg have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 37.4 years in Federal way.
  • Wallsburg has a higher median income of $99,500 compared to $80,360 in Federal way.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Wallsburg at 53.0% compared to 39.0% in Federal way.
  • The poverty level is higher in Federal way at 9%, compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
  • Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 2.5% in Wallsburg.

Demographics

Demographics Wallsburg vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wallsburg Federal way
Black Data is updating 17
White 93 34
Asian Data is updating 15
Hispanic 7 19
Two or More Races Data is updating 14
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Wallsburg vs Federal way

  • In Federal way, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
  • Wallsburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 34% in Federal way.
  • In Federal way, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 0% in Wallsburg.
  • Federal way has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 7% in Wallsburg.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
  • In Federal way, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Wallsburg.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wallsburg Federal way
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% 10.9%
Depression 22.8% 24.7%
Smoking 9.1% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 13.2% 16.5%
Obesity 28.0% 27.2%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wallsburg vs Federal way

  • In Federal way, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.3% in Wallsburg.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Federal way at 24.7% versus 22.8% in Wallsburg.
  • Federal way has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 9.1% in Wallsburg.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Federal way at 16.5% compared to 13.2% in Wallsburg.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Wallsburg at 28.0% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Federal way at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Wallsburg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wallsburg Federal way
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.8% (1,735)
High School Diploma 27.6% (82) 15.3% (15,003)
Less than High School 7.4% (22) 11.0% (10,805)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.4% (28) 21.2% (20,761)

Education Levels Comparison: Wallsburg vs Federal way

  • In Federal way, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Wallsburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wallsburg hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 15.3% in Federal way.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Federal way at 11.0%, compared to 7.4% in Wallsburg.
  • In Federal way, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 9.4% in Wallsburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.