Demographics details for Wallsburg, UT vs Conroe, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wallsburg, UT vs Conroe, TX.
| Data | Wallsburg | Conroe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 297 | 101,405 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $99,500 | $71,630 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Wallsburg vs Conroe
- The population in Conroe is higher at 101,405, compared to 297 in Wallsburg.
- Residents in Wallsburg have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 33.5 years in Conroe.
- Wallsburg has a higher median income of $99,500 compared to $71,630 in Conroe.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wallsburg at 53.0% compared to 37.0% in Conroe.
- The poverty level is higher in Conroe at 11%, compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- Conroe has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Wallsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Wallsburg vs Conroe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wallsburg | Conroe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 10 |
| White | 93 | 50 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Wallsburg vs Conroe
- In Conroe, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- Wallsburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 50% in Conroe.
- In Conroe, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Wallsburg.
- Conroe has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 7% in Wallsburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Conroe at 10%, compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- In Conroe, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wallsburg | Conroe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 9.1% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 28.0% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wallsburg vs Conroe
- In Conroe, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.3% in Wallsburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wallsburg at 22.8% compared to 22.5% in Conroe.
- Conroe has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 9.1% in Wallsburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Conroe at 17.4% compared to 13.2% in Wallsburg.
- Conroe has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 28.0% in Wallsburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wallsburg at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Conroe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wallsburg | Conroe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (1,025) |
| High School Diploma | 27.6% (82) | 11.8% (11,921) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (22) | 15.0% (15,214) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (28) | 18.9% (19,161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wallsburg vs Conroe
- In Conroe, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Wallsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wallsburg hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 11.8% in Conroe.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Conroe at 15.0%, compared to 7.4% in Wallsburg.
- In Conroe, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 9.4% in Wallsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.