Demographics details for Wallace, SC vs Washington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wallace, SC vs Washington, NC.
| Data | Wallace | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 662 | 10,828 |
| Median Age | 59.8 years | 48.0 years |
| Median Income | $19,423 | $38,927 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Wallace vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 10,828, compared to 662 in Wallace.
- Residents in Wallace have a higher median age of 59.8 years compared to 48.0 years in Washington.
- Washington has a higher median income of $38,927, compared to $19,423 in Wallace.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wallace at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- Wallace has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 16% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.0% in Wallace.
Demographics
Demographics Wallace vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wallace | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | 49 |
| White | 44 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | 4 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Wallace vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 42% in Wallace.
- Wallace has a higher percentage of White residents at 44% compared to 41% in Washington.
- Both Wallace and Washington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Wallace.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wallace at 10% compared to 3% in Washington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wallace at 4% compared to 1% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wallace | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 41.2% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wallace vs Washington
- More residents in Wallace report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.3% in Washington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 22.8% versus 22.5% in Wallace.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wallace at 25.2% compared to 21.9% in Washington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wallace at 15.6% compared to 14.7% in Washington.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 41.2% in Wallace.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wallace at 28.0% compared to 24.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wallace | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (10) | 1.2% (128) |
| High School Diploma | 57.4% (380) | 19.0% (2,058) |
| Less than High School | 28.2% (187) | 13.7% (1,487) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.1% (7) | 10.3% (1,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wallace vs Washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Wallace have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.2% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wallace hold a high school diploma at 57.4% compared to 19.0% in Washington.
- More residents in Wallace have less than a high school education at 28.2% compared to 13.7% in Washington.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 1.1% in Wallace.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.