Demographics details for Wallace, SC vs Warrensburg, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wallace, SC vs Warrensburg, MO.
| Data | Wallace | Warrensburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 662 | 19,458 |
| Median Age | 59.8 years | 24.4 years |
| Median Income | $19,423 | $54,535 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Wallace vs Warrensburg
- The population in Warrensburg is higher at 19,458, compared to 662 in Wallace.
- Residents in Wallace have a higher median age of 59.8 years compared to 24.4 years in Warrensburg.
- Warrensburg has a higher median income of $54,535, compared to $19,423 in Wallace.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wallace at 35.0% compared to 27.0% in Warrensburg.
- Wallace has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 14% in Warrensburg.
- The unemployment rate in Wallace is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Warrensburg.
Demographics
Demographics Wallace vs Warrensburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wallace | Warrensburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | 4 |
| White | 44 | 80 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 7 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wallace vs Warrensburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wallace at 42% compared to 4% in Warrensburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Warrensburg at 80% compared to 44% in Wallace.
- In Warrensburg, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Wallace.
- Warrensburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Wallace.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wallace at 10% compared to 7% in Warrensburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wallace at 4% compared to 0% in Warrensburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wallace | Warrensburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 41.2% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wallace vs Warrensburg
- More residents in Wallace report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.4% in Warrensburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Warrensburg at 24.3% versus 22.5% in Wallace.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wallace at 25.2% compared to 20.8% in Warrensburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Warrensburg at 16.8% compared to 15.6% in Wallace.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wallace at 41.2% compared to 37.2% in Warrensburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wallace at 28.0% compared to 11.0% in Warrensburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wallace | Warrensburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (10) | 0.8% (150) |
| High School Diploma | 57.4% (380) | 9.7% (1,895) |
| Less than High School | 28.2% (187) | 6.0% (1,174) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.1% (7) | 18.4% (3,573) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wallace vs Warrensburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Wallace have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.8% in Warrensburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wallace hold a high school diploma at 57.4% compared to 9.7% in Warrensburg.
- More residents in Wallace have less than a high school education at 28.2% compared to 6.0% in Warrensburg.
- In Warrensburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 1.1% in Wallace.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.