Demographics details for Wallace, SC vs Sand springs, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wallace, SC vs Sand springs, OK.
| Data | Wallace | Sand springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 662 | 20,031 |
| Median Age | 59.8 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $19,423 | $70,431 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Wallace vs Sand springs
- The population in Sand springs is higher at 20,031, compared to 662 in Wallace.
- Residents in Wallace have a higher median age of 59.8 years compared to 36.6 years in Sand springs.
- Sand springs has a higher median income of $70,431, compared to $19,423 in Wallace.
- In Sand springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 35.0% in Wallace.
- Wallace has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 9% in Sand springs.
- The unemployment rate in Wallace is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.8% in Sand springs.
Demographics
Demographics Wallace vs Sand springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wallace | Sand springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | 2 |
| White | 44 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 9 |
| American Indian | 4 | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Wallace vs Sand springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wallace at 42% compared to 2% in Sand springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sand springs at 76% compared to 44% in Wallace.
- In Sand springs, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Wallace.
- Sand springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Wallace.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wallace at 10% compared to 9% in Sand springs.
- In Sand springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 4% in Wallace.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wallace | Sand springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 41.2% | 35.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wallace vs Sand springs
- More residents in Wallace report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.6% in Sand springs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sand springs at 26.9% versus 22.5% in Wallace.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wallace at 25.2% compared to 18.2% in Sand springs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wallace at 15.6% compared to 15.0% in Sand springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wallace at 41.2% compared to 35.7% in Sand springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wallace at 28.0% compared to 17.0% in Sand springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wallace | Sand springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (10) | 0.5% (98) |
| High School Diploma | 57.4% (380) | 16.8% (3,364) |
| Less than High School | 28.2% (187) | 11.3% (2,260) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.1% (7) | 15.2% (3,042) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wallace vs Sand springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Wallace have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Sand springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wallace hold a high school diploma at 57.4% compared to 16.8% in Sand springs.
- More residents in Wallace have less than a high school education at 28.2% compared to 11.3% in Sand springs.
- In Sand springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 1.1% in Wallace.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.