Demographics details for Wallace, SC vs Kimmell, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wallace, SC vs Kimmell, IN.
| Data | Wallace | Kimmell |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 662 | 453 |
| Median Age | 59.8 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $19,423 | $36,667 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Wallace vs Kimmell
- In Wallace, the population is higher at 662, compared to 453 in Kimmell.
- Residents in Wallace have a higher median age of 59.8 years compared to 37.4 years in Kimmell.
- Kimmell has a higher median income of $36,667, compared to $19,423 in Wallace.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wallace at 35.0% compared to 30.0% in Kimmell.
- Wallace has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 8% in Kimmell.
- The unemployment rate in Wallace is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Kimmell.
Demographics
Demographics Wallace vs Kimmell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wallace | Kimmell |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | Data is updating |
| White | 44 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 10 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wallace vs Kimmell
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wallace at 42% compared to 0% in Kimmell.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kimmell at 100% compared to 44% in Wallace.
- Both Wallace and Kimmell have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Wallace and Kimmell at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wallace at 10% compared to 0% in Kimmell.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wallace at 4% compared to 0% in Kimmell.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wallace | Kimmell |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 41.2% | 39.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wallace vs Kimmell
- More residents in Wallace report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 16.7% in Kimmell.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kimmell at 26.2% versus 22.5% in Wallace.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wallace at 25.2% compared to 19.2% in Kimmell.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kimmell at 17.4% compared to 15.6% in Wallace.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wallace at 41.2% compared to 39.8% in Kimmell.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wallace at 28.0% compared to 18.0% in Kimmell.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wallace | Kimmell |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (10) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 57.4% (380) | 28.7% (130) |
| Less than High School | 28.2% (187) | 41.5% (188) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.1% (7) | 2.0% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wallace vs Kimmell
- A higher percentage of residents in Wallace have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Kimmell.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wallace hold a high school diploma at 57.4% compared to 28.7% in Kimmell.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kimmell at 41.5%, compared to 28.2% in Wallace.
- In Kimmell, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 2.0% compared to 1.1% in Wallace.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.