Demographics details for Wallace, SC vs Bryant, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wallace, SC vs Bryant, SD.
| Data | Wallace | Bryant |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 662 | 473 |
| Median Age | 59.8 years | 22.8 years |
| Median Income | $19,423 | $58,558 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 56.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Wallace vs Bryant
- In Wallace, the population is higher at 662, compared to 473 in Bryant.
- Residents in Wallace have a higher median age of 59.8 years compared to 22.8 years in Bryant.
- Bryant has a higher median income of $58,558, compared to $19,423 in Wallace.
- In Bryant, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 35.0% in Wallace.
- Wallace has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 10% in Bryant.
- The unemployment rate in Wallace is higher at 4.0%, compared to 2.5% in Bryant.
Demographics
Demographics Wallace vs Bryant provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wallace | Bryant |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | Data is updating |
| White | 44 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wallace vs Bryant
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wallace at 42% compared to 0% in Bryant.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bryant at 89% compared to 44% in Wallace.
- Both Wallace and Bryant have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Bryant has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 0% in Wallace.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wallace at 10% compared to 0% in Bryant.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wallace at 4% compared to 0% in Bryant.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wallace | Bryant |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 18.0% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 20.1% |
| Obesity | 41.2% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wallace vs Bryant
- More residents in Wallace report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 13.2% in Bryant.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wallace at 22.5% compared to 18.0% in Bryant.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wallace at 25.2% compared to 17.5% in Bryant.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bryant at 20.1% compared to 15.6% in Wallace.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wallace at 41.2% compared to 36.6% in Bryant.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wallace at 28.0% compared to 10.0% in Bryant.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wallace | Bryant |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (10) | 3.4% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 57.4% (380) | 32.8% (155) |
| Less than High School | 28.2% (187) | 33.0% (156) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.1% (7) | 6.1% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wallace vs Bryant
- In Bryant, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 1.5% in Wallace.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wallace hold a high school diploma at 57.4% compared to 32.8% in Bryant.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bryant at 33.0%, compared to 28.2% in Wallace.
- In Bryant, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.1% compared to 1.1% in Wallace.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.