Demographics details for Wallace, SC vs Ashville, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wallace, SC vs Ashville, OH.
| Data | Wallace | Ashville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 662 | 4,689 |
| Median Age | 59.8 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $19,423 | $60,293 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Wallace vs Ashville
- The population in Ashville is higher at 4,689, compared to 662 in Wallace.
- Residents in Wallace have a higher median age of 59.8 years compared to 35.1 years in Ashville.
- Ashville has a higher median income of $60,293, compared to $19,423 in Wallace.
- In Ashville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Wallace.
- Wallace has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 8% in Ashville.
- The unemployment rate in Wallace is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Ashville.
Demographics
Demographics Wallace vs Ashville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wallace | Ashville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | 3 |
| White | 44 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 2 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wallace vs Ashville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wallace at 42% compared to 3% in Ashville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ashville at 91% compared to 44% in Wallace.
- Both Wallace and Ashville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Ashville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Wallace.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wallace at 10% compared to 2% in Ashville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wallace at 4% compared to 0% in Ashville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wallace | Ashville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 41.2% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wallace vs Ashville
- More residents in Wallace report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.6% in Ashville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ashville at 24.6% versus 22.5% in Wallace.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wallace at 25.2% compared to 20.6% in Ashville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ashville at 18.7% compared to 15.6% in Wallace.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wallace at 41.2% compared to 41.1% in Ashville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wallace at 28.0% compared to 19.0% in Ashville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wallace | Ashville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (10) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 57.4% (380) | 25.7% (1,206) |
| Less than High School | 28.2% (187) | 10.2% (476) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.1% (7) | 8.4% (392) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wallace vs Ashville
- A higher percentage of residents in Wallace have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Ashville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wallace hold a high school diploma at 57.4% compared to 25.7% in Ashville.
- More residents in Wallace have less than a high school education at 28.2% compared to 10.2% in Ashville.
- In Ashville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.4% compared to 1.1% in Wallace.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.