Demographics details for Wakita, OK vs Richlands, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wakita, OK vs Richlands, NC.
| Data | Wakita | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 307 | 2,355 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 28.9 years |
| Median Income | $34,375 | $59,333 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Wakita vs Richlands
- The population in Richlands is higher at 2,355, compared to 307 in Wakita.
- Residents in Wakita have a higher median age of 35.5 years compared to 28.9 years in Richlands.
- Richlands has a higher median income of $59,333, compared to $34,375 in Wakita.
- In Richlands, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 32.0% in Wakita.
- Wakita has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Richlands.
- Richlands has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Wakita.
Demographics
Demographics Wakita vs Richlands provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wakita | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 17 |
| White | 74 | 65 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wakita vs Richlands
- In Richlands, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Wakita.
- Wakita has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 65% in Richlands.
- In Richlands, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Wakita.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wakita at 20% compared to 10% in Richlands.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richlands at 7%, compared to 4% in Wakita.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wakita at 2% compared to 0% in Richlands.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wakita | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 17.8% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wakita vs Richlands
- More residents in Wakita report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.5% in Richlands.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wakita at 25.5% compared to 23.5% in Richlands.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wakita at 17.8% compared to 16.6% in Richlands.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Richlands at 17.4% compared to 15.8% in Wakita.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wakita at 39.1% compared to 36.7% in Richlands.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wakita at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Richlands.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wakita | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (20) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (77) | 18.9% (445) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (32) | 11.6% (273) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (35) | 17.3% (408) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wakita vs Richlands
- In Richlands, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Wakita.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wakita hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 18.9% in Richlands.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richlands at 11.6%, compared to 10.4% in Wakita.
- In Richlands, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 11.4% in Wakita.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.