Demographics details for Waipahu, HI vs Taylorsville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waipahu, HI vs Taylorsville, GA.
| Data | Waipahu | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,873 | 258 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 56.7 years |
| Median Income | $87,961 | $41,250 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 62.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Waipahu vs Taylorsville
- In Waipahu, the population is higher at 39,873, compared to 258 in Taylorsville.
- The median age in Taylorsville is higher at 56.7 years, compared to 39.6 years in Waipahu.
- Waipahu has a higher median income of $87,961 compared to $41,250 in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 38.0% in Waipahu.
- The poverty level is identical in both Waipahu and Taylorsville at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Waipahu is higher at 4.6%, compared to 4.5% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Waipahu vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waipahu | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 11 | 82 |
| Asian | 67 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waipahu vs Taylorsville
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Waipahu and Taylorsville at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Taylorsville at 82% compared to 11% in Waipahu.
- The Asian population is larger in Waipahu at 67% compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Waipahu.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waipahu at 15% compared to 7% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waipahu and Taylorsville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waipahu | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.3% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 10.2% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 12.9% | 17.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 22.4% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 40.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waipahu vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 12.7% in Waipahu.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 24.1% versus 10.2% in Waipahu.
- Taylorsville has a higher smoking rate at 17.8% compared to 12.9% in Waipahu.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Taylorsville at 17.0% compared to 14.8% in Waipahu.
- Taylorsville has higher obesity rates at 32.5% compared to 22.4% in Waipahu.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 14.0% in Waipahu.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waipahu | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (729) | 0.8% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 22.1% (8,831) | 24.8% (64) |
| Less than High School | 11.0% (4,392) | 51.2% (132) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (5,195) | 22.5% (58) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waipahu vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of residents in Waipahu have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 22.1% in Waipahu.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 51.2%, compared to 11.0% in Waipahu.
- In Taylorsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 13.0% in Waipahu.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.