Demographics details for Waipahu, HI vs Fullerton, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waipahu, HI vs Fullerton, CA.
| Data | Waipahu | Fullerton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,873 | 140,541 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 35.5 years |
| Median Income | $87,961 | $99,279 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Waipahu vs Fullerton
- The population in Fullerton is higher at 140,541, compared to 39,873 in Waipahu.
- Residents in Waipahu have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 35.5 years in Fullerton.
- Fullerton has a higher median income of $99,279, compared to $87,961 in Waipahu.
- In Fullerton, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 38.0% in Waipahu.
- The poverty level is higher in Fullerton at 12%, compared to 10% in Waipahu.
- The unemployment rate in Waipahu is higher at 4.6%, compared to 4.1% in Fullerton.
Demographics
Demographics Waipahu vs Fullerton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waipahu | Fullerton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 11 | 22 |
| Asian | 67 | 25 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 38 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Waipahu vs Fullerton
- In Fullerton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Waipahu.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fullerton at 22% compared to 11% in Waipahu.
- The Asian population is larger in Waipahu at 67% compared to 25% in Fullerton.
- Fullerton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 38%, compared to 6% in Waipahu.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waipahu at 15% compared to 12% in Fullerton.
- In Fullerton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Waipahu.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waipahu | Fullerton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.3% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 10.2% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 12.9% | 10.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 22.4% | 25.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waipahu vs Fullerton
- In Fullerton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 12.7% in Waipahu.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fullerton at 16.8% versus 10.2% in Waipahu.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waipahu at 12.9% compared to 10.1% in Fullerton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fullerton at 15.5% compared to 14.8% in Waipahu.
- Fullerton has higher obesity rates at 25.7% compared to 22.4% in Waipahu.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waipahu at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Fullerton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waipahu | Fullerton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (729) | 1.6% (2,259) |
| High School Diploma | 22.1% (8,831) | 10.0% (13,991) |
| Less than High School | 11.0% (4,392) | 13.2% (18,547) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (5,195) | 29.7% (41,772) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waipahu vs Fullerton
- A higher percentage of residents in Waipahu have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.6% in Fullerton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waipahu hold a high school diploma at 22.1% compared to 10.0% in Fullerton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fullerton at 13.2%, compared to 11.0% in Waipahu.
- In Fullerton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.7% compared to 13.0% in Waipahu.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.